Logical arguments are used in all sorts of arguments. Whether you’re arguing with someone in class or with your friends on the playground, logic is a powerful tool that can help us reach important conclusions. Even if we think something intuitively, it’s important to at least look it up and see if it bears any truth. For instance, if I were to say that “Rama did not get his papers finished in time,” and you believe “Rama did get his papers finished in time,” then logically it’s true because the premises are true. In this example, both “Rama” and “time” are logical arguments.
Some of the most common logical fallacies are also the most common fallacies in common life. For example, the syllogistic argument (also known as the “duplicate charge”) states that A is more superior to B, because it contains more elements. The problem with this type of argument is that you are effectively arguing against something that you don’t believe. Here’s an example: “If Rama was given credit cards with a thousand rupees limit, he would buy A and B.”
If we use the techniques of inductive and deductive logic, we can refine our logic even further. Inductive logic is based on the idea of logical relationships between objects. It can be defined as “the use of available information to infer the truth from an unknown or incomplete set of facts”. Inductive arguments rely on our ability to relate certain facts to each other. Inductive arguments rely on logic to “establish a relationship” between A and B. This is very similar to our basic idea of “correlation” when we talk about stock prices.
Deductive arguments, on the other hand, are simply arguments that rest on a single premise and are usually accompanied by a logical conclusion. A deductive argument is “the only possible conclusion” if A and B both exist, and there is no other possible conclusion. We can see how easy it would be to argue for either A or B if we simply took our argument deductively. But when it comes to a deductive argument, we must take our arguments one step further.
One of the biggest problems with logic is that it is based on language. We typically cannot express all our ideas in language; our brains work through a complex network of natural language to communicate our ideas. This makes it extremely difficult for us to analyze a given argument logically. And even if we could, many people claim that it would not be satisfactory.
We do have other ways of communicating our ideas though. One popular technique used in arguments is argumentative essay writing. Argumentative essay writing is simply a form of persuasive writing. The writer uses carefully chosen carefully analyzed language to argue his or her points of view using persuasive arguments.
One of the biggest problems with logic is that most people do not recognize its fallacies. It is often hard for them to realize that logic is just a tool for reasoning, rather than a complete system of reasoning. Most people think that all of the ideas that they have can be proven by logic. However, this is simply not the case. Logic is nothing more than a methodology for uncovering certain types of reasoning.
For example, it is common for someone to argue that X is true because of the existence of a God. This is completely wrong because of the common language patterns used in this argument. This doesn’t mean that the arguments are bad though. They are merely flawed in the way they are expressed. To really understand all the logical fallacies of logic, you should thoroughly look at all of the common language patterns that are used in arguments.